Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-7100
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.3 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.3 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
58.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
126.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
25.77k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
23.26k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
5.43k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
4.09k (x0.75)
TOTAL
43.82k
58.55k (x1.34)
Multithread
3000G
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
54.98k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
54.73k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
13.12k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
3.65k (x0.65)
TOTAL
95.84k
126.47k (x1.32)
Performance/W
3000G
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
2480 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
6607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5964 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1393 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1049 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
15014 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4