Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-6100
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
112.28k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
22.89k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
21.04k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
4.9k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
4.01k (x0.74)
TOTAL
43.82k
52.84k (x1.21)
Multithread
3000G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
50.05k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
47.13k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
11.38k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
3.72k (x0.66)
TOTAL
95.84k
112.28k (x1.17)
Performance/W
3000G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4