| | | | | | |

Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-4170


Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-4170 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-4170 gets 92.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3000G is 1 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
44.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
92.71k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
22.17k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
12.58k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
5.09k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
4.4k (x0.81)
TOTAL
43.82k
44.24k (x1.01)

Multithread

3000G

i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
47k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
31.06k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
11.96k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
2.68k (x0.48)
TOTAL
95.84k
92.71k (x0.97)

Performance/W
3000G
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
222 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
1717 points/W

Performance/GHz
3000G
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
5991 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
3401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1375 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1189 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
11956 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4