Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-4030U
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 2.1 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 2.1 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
40651
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
46.09k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
10.69k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
6.16k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
2.49k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
2.23k (x0.41)
TOTAL
43.82k
21.57k (x0.49)
Multithread
3000G
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
21.84k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
15.86k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
5.94k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
2.45k (x0.44)
TOTAL
95.84k
46.09k (x0.48)
Performance/W
3000G
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
1057 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
396 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
163 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
3073 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
5627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
3241 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
11353 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4