Athlon 3000G vs N150
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the is based on Gracemont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
b06e0
Core
Picasso
Twin Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2025
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
36.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
112.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
14.42k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
11.18k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
5.68k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
5.25k (x0.97)
TOTAL
43.82k
36.54k (x0.83)
Multithread
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
50.39k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
37.69k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
20.09k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
4.53k (x0.81)
TOTAL
95.84k
112.69k (x1.18)
Performance/W
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
8398 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
6282 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
3348 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
755 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
18782 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
4006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
3106 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1459 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4