| | | | | | |

Athlon 3000G vs Ryzen 5 3550H


Description
Both models 3000G and 3550H are based on Zen+ architecture.

Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.9 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f81
Core
Picasso
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
178.26k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
13.51k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
22.34k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
4.98k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
4.24k (x0.78)
TOTAL
43.82k
45.07k (x1.03)

Multithread

3000G

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
52.21k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
95.66k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
25.54k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
4.85k (x0.86)
TOTAL
95.84k
178.26k (x1.86)

Performance/W
3000G
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
1492 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
730 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
5093 points/W

Performance/GHz
3000G
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
6038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
12182 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4