| | | | | | |

Athlon 3000G vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.

Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f10
Core
Picasso
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
71.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
10.73k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
18.15k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
3.99k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
3.89k (x0.72)
TOTAL
43.82k
36.77k (x0.84)

Multithread

3000G

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
20.11k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
36.87k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
10.74k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
3.31k (x0.59)
TOTAL
95.84k
71.02k (x0.74)

Performance/W
3000G
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
4735 points/W

Performance/GHz
3000G
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4