Athlon II X2 260 vs Pentium N3530
Description
The 260 is based on K10 architecture while the N3530 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the N3530 gets 34.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N3530 is 1.3 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the N3530 gets 34.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N3530 is 1.3 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f63
30678
Core
Regor
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
May 2010
February 2014
Mean monothread perf.
17.05k points
10.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
34.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
260
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
4.86k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
2.5k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
1.82k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
1.26k (x0.74)
TOTAL
17.05k
10.44k (x0.61)
Multithread
260
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
17.22k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
8.89k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
6.89k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
1.57k (x0.7)
TOTAL
27.54k
34.57k (x1.26)
Performance/W
260
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
154 points/W
2460 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78 points/W
984 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
4938 points/W
Performance/GHz
260
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
1884 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
707 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
488 points/GHz
TOTAL
5328 points/GHz
4047 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4