Athlon II X2 260 vs Core i3-7100U
Description
The 260 is based on K10 architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i3-7100U gets 57.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 2.1 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i3-7100U gets 57.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 2.1 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f63
806e9
Core
Regor
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2010
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.05k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
79.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
260
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
8.66k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
12.31k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
3.28k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
3.92k (x2.3)
TOTAL
17.05k
28.16k (x1.65)
Multithread
260
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
17.87k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
28.59k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
7.68k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
3.15k (x1.4)
TOTAL
27.54k
57.28k (x2.08)
Performance/W
260
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
154 points/W
1191 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
1906 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78 points/W
512 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
210 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
3819 points/W
Performance/GHz
260
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
3609 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/GHz
5128 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
5328 points/GHz
11735 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4