Athlon II X2 260 vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The 260 is based on K10 architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.8 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.8 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f63
506e3
Core
Regor
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2048 kB
Date
May 2010
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.05k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
49.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
260
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
8.56k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
12.25k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
3.17k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
3.35k (x1.97)
TOTAL
17.05k
27.33k (x1.6)
Multithread
260
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
16.42k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
23.61k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
5.75k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
3.55k (x1.58)
TOTAL
27.54k
49.34k (x1.79)
Performance/W
260
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
154 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
1410 points/W
Performance/GHz
260
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
5328 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4