Athlon II X2 260 vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The 260 is based on K10 architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.4 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.4 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f63
306a9
Core
Regor
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2048 kB
Date
May 2010
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
17.05k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
38.59k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
260
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
7.87k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
7.14k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
3.04k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
2.79k (x1.64)
TOTAL
17.05k
20.84k (x1.22)
Multithread
260
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
15.12k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
14.05k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
5.94k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
3.48k (x1.55)
TOTAL
27.54k
38.59k (x1.4)
Performance/W
260
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
154 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
260
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
5328 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4