Athlon II X2 260 vs Celeron E3300
Description
The 260 is based on K10 architecture while the E3300 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 1.1 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 1.1 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f63
1067a
Core
Regor
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.05k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
24.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
260
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
2.9k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
6.38k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
2.59k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
1.08k (x0.63)
TOTAL
17.05k
12.94k (x0.76)
Multithread
260
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
5.76k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
12.67k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
5.16k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
1.01k (x0.45)
TOTAL
27.54k
24.6k (x0.89)
Performance/W
260
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
154 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
378 points/W
Performance/GHz
260
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
5328 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4