Athlon II X2 260 vs Celeron 3855U
Description
The 260 is based on K10 architecture while the 3855U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the 3855U gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 1.1 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the 3855U gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 1.1 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f63
406e3
Core
Regor
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2096 kB
Date
May 2010
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.05k points
19.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
24.56k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
260
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
5.93k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
8.53k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
2.28k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
2.5k (x1.47)
TOTAL
17.05k
19.24k (x1.13)
Multithread
260
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
7.87k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
11.28k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
2.91k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
2.5k (x1.11)
TOTAL
27.54k
24.56k (x0.89)
Performance/W
260
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
154 points/W
524 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
752 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78 points/W
194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
1637 points/W
Performance/GHz
260
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
3706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/GHz
5333 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
1423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
1562 points/GHz
TOTAL
5328 points/GHz
12024 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4