Athlon II M300 vs Xeon E3-1230 v5
Description
The M300 is based on K10 architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 2.1 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 2.1 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f62
506e3
Core
Caspian
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket S1G3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2009
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
9.57k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.73k points
37.88k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
M300
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
2.66k
2.59k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
3.84k
3.94k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.97k
1k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.1k
2k (x1.81)
TOTAL
9.57k
9.52k (x1)
Multithread
M300
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
5.04k
10.4k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
7.46k
16.64k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.75k
4.51k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.48k
6.33k (x4.28)
TOTAL
17.73k
37.88k (x2.14)
Performance/W
M300
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
144 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
213 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
506 points/W
474 points/W
Performance/GHz
M300
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
1328 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
550 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
4784 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4