Athlon II M300 vs Celeron J3455
Description
The M300 is based on K10 architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 2.7 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 2.7 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f62
506c9
Core
Caspian
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket S1G3
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2009
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
9.57k points
12.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.73k points
47.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
M300
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
2.66k
6.02k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
3.84k
3.49k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.97k
2.01k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.1k
1.47k (x1.33)
TOTAL
9.57k
12.98k (x1.36)
Multithread
M300
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
5.04k
23.7k (x4.7)
Test#2 (FP)
7.46k
13.75k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.75k
7.8k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.48k
2.09k (x1.41)
TOTAL
17.73k
47.34k (x2.67)
Performance/W
M300
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
144 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
213 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
506 points/W
4734 points/W
Performance/GHz
M300
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
1328 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
550 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
4784 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4