Athlon II M300 vs A6 9210
Description
The M300 is based on K10 architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.4 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.4 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f62
670f00
Core
Caspian
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket S1G3
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2009
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
9.57k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.73k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
M300
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2.66k
4.87k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
3.84k
10.38k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.97k
2.59k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.1k
2.38k (x2.17)
TOTAL
9.57k
20.22k (x2.11)
Multithread
M300
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
5.04k
7.41k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
7.46k
11.87k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.75k
3.35k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.48k
2.6k (x1.76)
TOTAL
17.73k
25.23k (x1.42)
Performance/W
M300
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
144 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
213 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
506 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
M300
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1328 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
550 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
4784 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4