Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The TK-42 is based on K8 architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 2.9 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 2.9 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
60f82
f4a
Core
Tyler
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
Socket S1g1
-
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
20 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
- kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
- kB
Cache L3
kB
- kB
Date
June 2009
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
6.28k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.91k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
TK-42
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
1.06k
3.87k (x3.65)
Test#2 (FP)
2.91k
8.17k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.43k
2.67k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
1.82k (x2.05)
TOTAL
6.28k
16.53k (x2.63)
Multithread
TK-42
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.02k
3.46k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
5.2k
22.59k (x4.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
8.09k (x3.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1k
2.85k (x2.85)
TOTAL
12.91k
37k (x2.87)
Performance/W
TK-42
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
201 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
260 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
645 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
TK-42
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
662 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1819 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
891 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
3927 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4