Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Atom N450
Description
The TK-42 is based on K8 architecture while the N450 is based on Bonnell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the N450 gets 4.6 k points.
Summarizing, the TK-42 is 2.8 times faster than the N450 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the N450 gets 4.6 k points.
Summarizing, the TK-42 is 2.8 times faster than the N450 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
60f82
106ca
Core
Tyler
Pineview
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.667 GHz
Socket
Socket S1g1
BGA 559
Cores/Threads
2/2
1 /2
TDP
20 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
512 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
June 2009
December 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.28k points
3.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.91k points
4.58k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
TK-42
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
1.06k
1.08k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
2.91k
0.84k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.43k
0.94k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
0.56k (x0.63)
TOTAL
6.28k
3.42k (x0.54)
Multithread
TK-42
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
4.02k
1.32k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
5.2k
1.33k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
1.29k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
1k
0.63k (x0.63)
TOTAL
12.91k
4.58k (x0.35)
Performance/W
TK-42
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
201 points/W
220 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
260 points/W
222 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
216 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
645 points/W
763 points/W
Performance/GHz
TK-42
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
662 points/GHz
647 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1819 points/GHz
504 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
891 points/GHz
563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/GHz
337 points/GHz
TOTAL
3927 points/GHz
2051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4