Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs E Series E-350
Description
The TK-42 is based on K8 architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the TK-42 is 1.3 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the TK-42 is 1.3 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
60f82
500f10
Core
Tyler
Zacate
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket S1g1
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
20 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
June 2009
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.28k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.91k points
10.05k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
TK-42
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.06k
1.78k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
2.91k
2.33k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.43k
1.41k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
0.74k (x0.84)
TOTAL
6.28k
6.26k (x1)
Multithread
TK-42
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
4.02k
2.84k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
5.2k
3.89k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
2.42k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
1k
0.9k (x0.9)
TOTAL
12.91k
10.05k (x0.78)
Performance/W
TK-42
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
201 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
260 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
645 points/W
558 points/W
Performance/GHz
TK-42
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
662 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1819 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
891 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
3927 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4