Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The TK-42 is based on K8 architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.3 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.3 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
60f82
300f10
Core
Tyler
Llano
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket S1g1
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
20 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
June 2009
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.28k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.91k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
TK-42
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1.06k
3.98k (x3.76)
Test#2 (FP)
2.91k
4k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.43k
2.05k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
1.37k (x1.54)
TOTAL
6.28k
11.4k (x1.81)
Multithread
TK-42
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
4.02k
5.74k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
5.2k
6.05k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
2.85k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1k
1.86k (x1.86)
TOTAL
12.91k
16.5k (x1.28)
Performance/W
TK-42
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
201 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
260 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
645 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
TK-42
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
662 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1819 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
891 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
3927 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4