Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Celeron N3060
Description
The 4200+ is based on K8 architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4200+ gets a score of 17.9 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4200+ is 1.3 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4200+ gets a score of 17.9 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4200+ is 1.3 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
60fb1
406c4
Core
Brisbane
Braswell
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
Socket AM2
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
January 2007
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
8.86k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.94k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4200+
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
2.77k
4.68k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
2.74k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
1.83k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.16k
0.9k (x5.52)
TOTAL
8.86k
10.15k (x1.15)
Multithread
4200+
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
5.81k
6.31k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
7.85k
3.68k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
2.46k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.31k
0.91k (x2.97)
TOTAL
17.94k
13.36k (x0.74)
Performance/W
4200+
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
121 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
5 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
276 points/W
2227 points/W
Performance/GHz
4200+
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1260 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1820 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
4025 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4