Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The 4200+ is based on K8 architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4200+ gets a score of 17.9 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 4.5 times faster than the 4200+. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4200+ gets a score of 17.9 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 4.5 times faster than the 4200+. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
60fb1
100fa0
Core
Brisbane
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM2
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2007
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
8.86k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.94k points
80.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4200+
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.15k
1.98k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
3.85k
4.57k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.73k
2.57k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.18k
3.51k (x19.77)
TOTAL
6.91k
12.64k (x1.83)
Multithread
4200+
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.23k
11.86k (x5.33)
Test#2 (FP)
7.33k
27.4k (x3.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
15.39k (x4.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.3k
3.46k (x11.48)
TOTAL
13.22k
58.11k (x4.4)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4200+
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.77k
5.17k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
5.33k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
2.76k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.16k
3.51k (x21.51)
TOTAL
8.86k
16.77k (x1.89)
Multithread
4200+
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.81k
29.82k (x5.13)
Test#2 (FP)
7.85k
30.79k (x3.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
15.88k (x3.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.31k
3.69k (x12.03)
TOTAL
17.94k
80.19k (x4.47)
Performance/W
4200+
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
121 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
5 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
276 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
4200+
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1260 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1820 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
4025 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4