Athlon 5150 APU vs A6 9210
Description
The 5150 APU is based on Jaguar architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5150 APU gets a score of 30.1 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5150 APU is 1.1 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5150 APU gets a score of 30.1 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5150 APU is 1.1 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
670f00
Core
Kabini
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
AM1
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
256 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
April 2014
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
8.26k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.06k points
27.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5150 APU
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3.02k
4.71k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
2.62k
11.03k (x4.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.59k
2.59k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.02k
2.45k (x2.39)
TOTAL
8.26k
20.78k (x2.52)
Multithread
5150 APU
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
12.06k
8.43k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.42k
12.8k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.32k
3.32k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
2.59k (x2.05)
TOTAL
30.06k
27.13k (x0.9)
Performance/W
5150 APU
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
483 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
417 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
1203 points/W
1809 points/W
Performance/GHz
5150 APU
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1890 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1637 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
639 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
5162 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4