| | | | | | |

A9 9425 vs Core i7-9750H


Description
The 9425 is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 6.9 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
906ea
Core
Stoney Ridge
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2018
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
65.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
286.43k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
25.93k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
22.84k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
5.11k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
11.46k (x5.12)
TOTAL
31.31k
65.33k (x2.09)

Multithread

9425

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
130.68k (x7.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
119.91k (x6.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
28.76k (x5.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
7.08k (x3.18)
TOTAL
41.73k
286.43k (x6.86)

Performance/W
9425
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
2904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
2665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
639 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
6365 points/W

Performance/GHz
9425
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
14519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4