A9 9425 vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The 9425 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7.4 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7.4 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
a0653
Core
Stoney Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
307.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
22k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
19.98k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
4.57k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
11.31k (x5.05)
TOTAL
31.31k
57.85k (x1.85)
Multithread
9425
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
136.69k (x8.25)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
135.25k (x7.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
32.76k (x6.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
2.48k (x1.11)
TOTAL
41.73k
307.18k (x7.36)
Performance/W
9425
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
9425
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4