A9 9425 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The 9425 is based on Excavator architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.7 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.7 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
810f10
Core
Stoney Ridge
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2018
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
71.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
10.73k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
18.15k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
3.99k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
3.89k (x1.74)
TOTAL
31.31k
36.77k (x1.17)
Multithread
9425
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
20.11k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
36.87k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
10.74k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
3.31k (x1.48)
TOTAL
41.73k
71.02k (x1.7)
Performance/W
9425
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
9425
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4