| | | | | | |

A9 9425 vs Ryzen 3 1200


Description
The 9425 is based on Excavator architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 1200 is 2.8 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
800f11
Core
Stoney Ridge
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2018
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
117.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
11.73k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
18.85k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
4.22k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
2.76k (x1.23)
TOTAL
31.31k
37.55k (x1.2)

Multithread

9425

1200
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
38.56k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
62.21k (x3.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
13.7k (x2.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
3.33k (x1.5)
TOTAL
41.73k
117.81k (x2.82)

Performance/W
9425
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
1812 points/W

Performance/GHz
9425
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4