A9 9425 vs A6 9220e
Description
Both models 9425 and 9220e are based on Excavator architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 9425 is 1.4 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 9425 is 1.4 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
670f00
Core
Stoney Ridge
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
May 2018
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
22.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
29.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
7.84k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
10.54k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
2.27k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
1.7k (x0.76)
TOTAL
31.31k
22.34k (x0.71)
Multithread
9425
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
11.42k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
12.58k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
3.62k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
1.77k (x0.8)
TOTAL
41.73k
29.39k (x0.7)
Performance/W
9425
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
1903 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
2097 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
603 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
4898 points/W
Performance/GHz
9425
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
3265 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
4390 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
9309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4