| | | | | | |

A9 9420 vs Pentium D 925


Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the 925 is based on NetBurst.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 28.9 k points while the 925 gets 14 k points.

Summarizing, the 9420 is 2.1 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
f65
Core
Stoney Ridge
Presler
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
16+8 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
October 2006
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
7.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
14.03k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
9420
925
Test#1 (Integers)
2.56k
1.52k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
9.97k
2.95k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.96k
1.51k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
0.82k (x0.38)
TOTAL
17.61k
6.79k (x0.39)

Multithread

9420

925
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
2.98k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
5.62k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
2.87k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.74k
0.82k (x0.47)
TOTAL
18.79k
12.29k (x0.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9420
925
Test#1 (Integers)
8.41k
2.06k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
11.48k
3.32k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.29k
1.52k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
0.8k (x0.36)
TOTAL
25.41k
7.7k (x0.3)

Multithread

9420

925
Test#1 (Integers)
11.25k
4k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
13.69k
6.32k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.09k
2.91k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.87k
0.81k (x0.43)
TOTAL
28.89k
14.03k (x0.49)

Performance/W
9420
925
Test#1 (Integers)
750 points/W
42 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
67 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
139 points/W
31 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
1926 points/W
148 points/W

Performance/GHz
9420
925
Test#1 (Integers)
2336 points/GHz
686 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3188 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
507 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
621 points/GHz
266 points/GHz
TOTAL
7058 points/GHz
2565 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4