A9 9420 vs Pentium P6200
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the P6200 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 28.9 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.3 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 28.9 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.3 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
20655
Core
Stoney Ridge
Arrandale
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
12.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
22.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9420
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
8.41k
5.29k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
11.48k
3.55k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.29k
2.1k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
1.8k (x0.81)
TOTAL
25.41k
12.74k (x0.5)
Multithread
9420
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
11.25k
10.06k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
13.69k
6.74k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.09k
3.96k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.87k
2.16k (x1.16)
TOTAL
28.89k
22.91k (x0.79)
Performance/W
9420
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
750 points/W
287 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
139 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
62 points/W
TOTAL
1926 points/W
655 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
2336 points/GHz
2478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3188 points/GHz
1667 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
621 points/GHz
845 points/GHz
TOTAL
7058 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4