A9 9420 vs Core i5-2320
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the i5-2320 gets 66.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2320 is 2.5 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the i5-2320 gets 66.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2320 is 2.5 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
206a7
Core
Stoney Ridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
66.48k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9420
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
7.55k
8.88k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
7.84k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
3.79k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
3.51k (x1.61)
TOTAL
26.74k
24.01k (x0.9)
Multithread
9420
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
9.09k
27.98k (x3.08)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
24.48k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
11.42k (x3.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
2.6k (x1.44)
TOTAL
26.15k
66.48k (x2.54)
Performance/W
9420
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
606 points/W
295 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
817 points/W
258 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
200 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
1743 points/W
700 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
2096 points/GHz
2689 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3862 points/GHz
2375 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
864 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
604 points/GHz
1063 points/GHz
TOTAL
7427 points/GHz
7277 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4