A9 9420 vs Core M-5Y10c
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.9 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.9 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
306d4
Core
Stoney Ridge
Broadwell-Y
Base frecuency
3 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
15 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
51k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9420
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
7.55k
7.22k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
9.98k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
2.75k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
2.98k (x1.37)
TOTAL
26.74k
22.93k (x0.86)
Multithread
9420
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
9.09k
15.07k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
24.8k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
6.68k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
4.46k (x2.47)
TOTAL
26.15k
51k (x1.95)
Performance/W
9420
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
606 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
817 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
200 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
1743 points/W
10200 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
2096 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3862 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
864 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
604 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
7427 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4