A9 9420 vs Engineering Sample 506E8
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 4.6 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 4.6 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
506e8
Core
Stoney Ridge
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
15 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2017
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
56.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
211.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9420
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
11.74k
23.91k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
16.05k
21.03k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
5.05k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
6.4k (x3.12)
TOTAL
33.09k
56.39k (x1.7)
Multithread
9420
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
95.3k (x5.13)
Test#2 (FP)
20.11k
91.94k (x4.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
22.06k (x4.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
2.3k (x0.97)
TOTAL
46.33k
211.6k (x4.57)
Performance/W
9420
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
1238 points/W