A9 9420 vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.3 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.3 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
810f81
Core
Stoney Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9420
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.74k
11.13k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
16.05k
19.38k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
4.47k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
3.87k (x1.89)
TOTAL
33.09k
38.85k (x1.17)
Multithread
9420
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
17.13k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.11k
30.56k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
9.44k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
4.09k (x1.72)
TOTAL
46.33k
61.23k (x1.32)
Performance/W
9420
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1238 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1340 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
352 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
159 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
3089 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3260 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4458 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
905 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
570 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
9192 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4