A9 9420 vs E1 2500
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the 2500 is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the 2500 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 2.9 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the 2500 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 2.9 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
700f01
Core
Stoney Ridge
Kabini
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.4 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
Socket FT3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
April 2017
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
6.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
9.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9420
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
7.55k
2.35k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
2.21k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
1.24k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
0.84k (x0.39)
TOTAL
26.74k
6.64k (x0.25)
Multithread
9420
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
9.09k
3.3k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
3.21k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
1.76k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
0.87k (x0.48)
TOTAL
26.15k
9.13k (x0.35)
Performance/W
9420
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
606 points/W
220 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
817 points/W
214 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
200 points/W
117 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
1743 points/W
609 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
2096 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3862 points/GHz
1581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
864 points/GHz
885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
604 points/GHz
600 points/GHz
TOTAL
7427 points/GHz
4745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4