A9 9420 vs 9425
Description
Both models 9420 and 9425 are based on Excavator architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.1 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.1 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
670f00
Core
Stoney Ridge
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
April 2017
May 2018
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
41.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9420
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
11.74k
11.23k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
16.05k
14.7k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.15k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.24k (x1.09)
TOTAL
33.09k
31.31k (x0.95)
Multithread
9420
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
16.58k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
20.11k
17.84k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
5.09k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
2.23k (x0.94)
TOTAL
46.33k
41.73k (x0.9)
Performance/W
9420
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
1238 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1340 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
352 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
159 points/W
148 points/W
TOTAL
3089 points/W
2782 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
3260 points/GHz
3034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4458 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
905 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
570 points/GHz
605 points/GHz
TOTAL
9192 points/GHz
8461 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4