A9 9420 vs A8 9600
Description
Both models 9420 and 9600 are based on Excavator architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 9600 gets 92.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 9600 is 2 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 9600 gets 92.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 9600 is 2 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
660f51
Core
Stoney Ridge
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
32.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
92.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9420
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
11.74k
11.66k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
16.05k
14.96k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.33k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.8k (x1.37)
TOTAL
33.09k
32.75k (x0.99)
Multithread
9420
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
38.61k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
20.11k
38.92k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
11.57k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
3.43k (x1.44)
TOTAL
46.33k
92.52k (x2)
Performance/W
9420
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
1238 points/W
594 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1340 points/W
599 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
352 points/W
178 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
159 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
3089 points/W
1423 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
3260 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4458 points/GHz
4400 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
905 points/GHz
979 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
570 points/GHz
824 points/GHz
TOTAL
9192 points/GHz
9632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4