A8 9600 vs Core E5-2620 v3
Description
The 9600 is based on Excavator architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 3.9 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 3.9 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
306f2
Core
Bristol Ridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
15360 kB
Date
September 2016
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
32.75k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.52k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9600
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
18.64k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
10.55k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
4.12k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.54k (x0.91)
TOTAL
32.75k
35.86k (x1.09)
Multithread
9600
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
38.61k
181.66k (x4.71)
Test#2 (FP)
38.92k
122.09k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
47.02k (x4.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.43k
7.22k (x2.1)
TOTAL
92.52k
357.99k (x3.87)
Performance/W
9600
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
599 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
178 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
1423 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
9600
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4400 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
824 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
9632 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4