| | | | | | |

A8 9600 vs Core i5-8365U


Description
The 9600 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8365U is 2.1 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
660f51
806ec
Core
Bristol Ridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2016
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.75k points
59.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.52k points
197.46k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9600
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
24.37k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
22.68k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
4.98k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
7.7k (x2.75)
TOTAL
32.75k
59.73k (x1.82)

Multithread

9600

i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.61k
89.45k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
38.92k
85.57k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
19.02k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.43k
3.41k (x0.99)
TOTAL
92.52k
197.46k (x2.13)

Performance/W
9600
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/W
5964 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
599 points/W
5705 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
178 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
1423 points/W
13164 points/W

Performance/GHz
9600
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
5944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4400 points/GHz
5531 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/GHz
1214 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
824 points/GHz
1879 points/GHz
TOTAL
9632 points/GHz
14568 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4