A8 9600 vs Core i5-8265U
Description
The 9600 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.5 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.5 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
806ec
Core
Bristol Ridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2016
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
32.75k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.52k points
143.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9600
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
19.19k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
17.47k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
4.04k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
5.97k (x2.13)
TOTAL
32.75k
46.67k (x1.43)
Multithread
9600
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.61k
64.43k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
38.92k
61.91k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
13.36k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.43k
3.52k (x1.03)
TOTAL
92.52k
143.23k (x1.55)
Performance/W
9600
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
599 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
178 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
1423 points/W
9548 points/W
Performance/GHz
9600
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4400 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
824 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
9632 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4