| | | | | | |

A8 9600 vs Core i3-4030U


Description
The 9600 is based on Excavator architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 9600 is 2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
660f51
40651
Core
Bristol Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2016
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
32.75k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.52k points
46.09k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9600
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
10.69k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
6.16k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
2.49k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.23k (x0.79)
TOTAL
32.75k
21.57k (x0.66)

Multithread

9600

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.61k
21.84k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
38.92k
15.86k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
5.94k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.43k
2.45k (x0.71)
TOTAL
92.52k
46.09k (x0.5)

Performance/W
9600
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
599 points/W
1057 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
178 points/W
396 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
163 points/W
TOTAL
1423 points/W
3073 points/W

Performance/GHz
9600
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
5627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4400 points/GHz
3241 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
824 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
9632 points/GHz
11353 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4