A8 9600 vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The 9600 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9600 is 1.2 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9600 is 1.2 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
810f81
Core
Bristol Ridge
Dali
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
32.75k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.52k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9600
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
9.33k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
17.1k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
3.57k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
3.26k (x1.16)
TOTAL
32.75k
33.26k (x1.02)
Multithread
9600
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.61k
22.14k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
38.92k
40.04k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
10.71k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.43k
5k (x1.46)
TOTAL
92.52k
77.88k (x0.84)
Performance/W
9600
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
599 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
178 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
1423 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
9600
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4400 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
824 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
9632 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4