A8 9600 vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The 9600 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9600 is 1.5 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9600 is 1.5 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
810f81
Core
Bristol Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.75k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.52k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9600
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
11.13k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
19.38k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
4.47k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
3.87k (x1.38)
TOTAL
32.75k
38.85k (x1.19)
Multithread
9600
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.61k
17.13k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
38.92k
30.56k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
9.44k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.43k
4.09k (x1.19)
TOTAL
92.52k
61.23k (x0.66)
Performance/W
9600
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
599 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
178 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
1423 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
9600
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4400 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
824 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
9632 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4