A8 5500 vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The 5500 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 52.1 k points while the i5-7200U gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.5 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 52.1 k points while the i5-7200U gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.5 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f01
806e9
Core
Trinity
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2012
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
22.25k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.13k points
97.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.61k
11.36k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
17.26k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.1k
4.03k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
4.77k (x1.46)
TOTAL
22.25k
37.42k (x1.68)
Multithread
5500
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.76k
24.08k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
18.75k
41.23k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
10.19k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
4.72k (x1.15)
TOTAL
52.13k
80.22k (x1.54)
Performance/W
5500
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
304 points/W
1605 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
289 points/W
2749 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
146 points/W
679 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
63 points/W
315 points/W
TOTAL
802 points/W
5348 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2326 points/GHz
3666 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1968 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
883 points/GHz
1537 points/GHz
TOTAL
6014 points/GHz
12072 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4