A8 5500 vs Core i5-3317U
Description
The 5500 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 52.1 k points while the i5-3317U gets 41.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 52.1 k points while the i5-3317U gets 41.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f01
306a9
Core
Trinity
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
65 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2012
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
22.25k points
17.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.13k points
41.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.61k
6.11k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
6.58k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.1k
2.48k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
2.71k (x0.83)
TOTAL
22.25k
17.88k (x0.8)
Multithread
5500
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.76k
13.67k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
18.75k
16.8k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
6.66k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
4.17k (x1.02)
TOTAL
52.13k
41.31k (x0.79)
Performance/W
5500
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
304 points/W
804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
289 points/W
988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
146 points/W
392 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
63 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
802 points/W
2430 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
2326 points/GHz
2351 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1968 points/GHz
2532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
883 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
6014 points/GHz
6879 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4