A6 9220e vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 7.3 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 7.3 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
50657
Core
Stoney Ridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
6 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2017
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
12.92k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
10.97k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
2.54k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
5.09k (x2.99)
TOTAL
22.34k
31.52k (x1.41)
Multithread
9220e
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
103.33k (x9.05)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
87.67k (x6.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
20.1k (x5.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
4.91k (x2.76)
TOTAL
29.39k
216.02k (x7.35)
Performance/W
9220e
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
9220e
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4