| | | | | | |

A6 9220e vs Core i7-4710HQ


Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the i7-4710HQ gets 155.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 5.3 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
306c3
Core
Stoney Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
6 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2017
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
40.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
155.24k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
20.98k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
10.48k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
4.75k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
4.44k (x2.61)
TOTAL
22.34k
40.65k (x1.82)

Multithread

9220e

i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
77.73k (x6.81)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
52.12k (x4.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
20.55k (x5.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
4.85k (x2.73)
TOTAL
29.39k
155.24k (x5.28)

Performance/W
9220e
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
3303 points/W

Performance/GHz
9220e
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
5994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
2993 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
11614 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4