| | | | | | |

A6 9220e vs Core i7-4600U


Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-4600U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the i7-4600U gets 64.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4600U is 2.2 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
40651
Core
Stoney Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2017
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
28.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
64.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
14.37k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
8.31k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
3.35k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
2.96k (x1.74)
TOTAL
22.34k
28.98k (x1.3)

Multithread

9220e

i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
31.32k (x2.74)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
20.17k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
8.02k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
5.03k (x2.84)
TOTAL
29.39k
64.55k (x2.2)

Performance/W
9220e
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
535 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
4303 points/W

Performance/GHz
9220e
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
4353 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
896 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
8781 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4