A6 9220e vs Core i3-8130U
Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 3 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 3 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
806ea
Core
Stoney Ridge
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2017
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
88.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
21.09k (x2.69)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
19.41k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
4.05k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
2.8k (x1.64)
TOTAL
22.34k
47.35k (x2.12)
Multithread
9220e
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
38.23k (x3.35)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
38.89k (x3.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
8.75k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
2.47k (x1.39)
TOTAL
29.39k
88.35k (x3.01)
Performance/W
9220e
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
5890 points/W
Performance/GHz
9220e
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4