A6 9220e vs Core i7-7020U
Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the i7-7020U gets 73.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7020U is 2.5 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the i7-7020U gets 73.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7020U is 2.5 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
806ea
Core
Stoney Ridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
33.63k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
73.15k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
14.25k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
12.72k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
2.81k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
3.86k (x2.27)
TOTAL
22.34k
33.63k (x1.51)
Multithread
9220e
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
31.11k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
31.15k (x2.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
6.9k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
3.99k (x2.25)
TOTAL
29.39k
73.15k (x2.49)
Performance/W
9220e
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
2074 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
2076 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
460 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
266 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
4877 points/W
Performance/GHz
9220e
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
6196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
5528 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
14624 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4